To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=28948
User sj changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Assigned to|sj |cgu
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 15 09:30:17 -0800
2005 -------
sj->cgu: The remaining problems are related to different text handling of OO and
PPT.
I mean, if a linespacing of 100% is set to "at least" 0 cm, then this is a huge
problem and must be fixed.
But if it only differs by some percent, then it depends to the fact that PPT is
using fixed linespacing, whereas we are using font dependent linespacing -> make
a test, export the bugdocs using different fonts, then you will see that
linespacing is depending to the font that is used. Here we can't do anything.
That "at least" is written instead of "proportional" is only done for the first
paragraph, because PPT is inserting linespacing before the text, whereas our
text is centered, so its just a kind of balancing.
I assume the above mentioned problems as well known, because I already described
the difference of Impress and PPT in a lot of other bugs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
