To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62492
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 8 08:30:45 -0700 2006 ------- IBTD. Though I agree that the techincal arguments of fst and others are correct this is not a technical but a usability issue. If people want to replace MSO by OOo they have some expectations we need to take into consideration. IMHO the format problems explained here are even more annoying than the UI differences we tried to remove in OOo2.0. Especially as in the current case where it should be easy to fix: If it is correct that "scalc.exe filename.xls" opens the file correctly the only thing that we need to do is registerung scalc.exe as application for "xls" files instead soffice.exe as we do now. This works with OOo2.0.2, IIRC it doesn't work in earlier versions. So this could be solved as a registration issue. @intersol: please try to verify this. Does it help to change the registration of "xls" files from soffice.exe to scalc.exe? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
