To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66726
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 26 09:06:05 -0700
2006 -------
1) The >= 32 was the problem. On 64bit:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> cat blah.cc
#include <cstdio>
int main( int, char ** )
{
unsigned long l = 0x1234567887654321;
printf( "%08lX\n", l );
return 0;
}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> g++ blah.cc -o blah
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> ./blah
1234567887654321
Of course, nothing that couldn't be addressed ;-) - but I wanted to keep the
patch minimal.
2) Yes, the methods would be mangled differently after that change... But on
the other hand, 64bit OOo uses 'int' for sal_u?Int32 - so then the 32bit &
64bit versions would be more alike ;-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
