To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67236
User ace_dent changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
CC|'' |'ace_dent'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 11 14:08:29 -0700
2006 -------
Again, 'cheaper' only when displaying images which have been downscaled. Cost is
increased decoding complexity when displayed at 1:1 scale (probably not too
bad?) and hurts compression. There might be a more optimal pixel size than
128x128- maybe slightly larger? I can provide real world png images for testing
and benchmarking if this is useful.
Regards,
Andrew
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]