To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67337
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 14 06:50:44 -0700
2006 -------
Other interesting(?) factoids: of the length 4+ timestamp fields is that they
always (for this doc) contain 2 0 quad-words, then a last quad-word.
68640001 0000 0000 [ 66a6aaaa ]
the last [ quad-word ] appears to be invariant over embedded word length, color,
identifiers (in the XML etc.) - but related to the timestamp as reflected by the
1st byte.
*More* strangely the 5 qword items appear to be the victims of mis-framing:
Timestamp field (5) delete 48630002 68640001 0000 0000 86a6b435
The '48630002' looks -very- much like it is the header of a pSprmCIbstRMark item
that has got lost somehow (?).
That in turn makes me very suspicious of the 4 qword items:
68640001 0000 0000 66a6aaaa
The 68640001 there appears to be another header (?) cf.
pPlcxMan->HasCharSprm( bIns ? 0x4804 : *** 0x4863 ***, aResult);
pSprmCIbstRMark = aResult.empty() ? 0 : aResult.back();
pPlcxMan->HasCharSprm( bIns ? 0x6805 : *** 0x6864 ***, aResult);
pSprmCDttmRMark = aResult.empty() ? 0 : aResult.front();
very strange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
