To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 24 06:18:14 -0700 2006 ------- There are several misconceptions about named character classes in regular expressions. A named character class [:name:] may appear in a bracket expression, so [[:digit:]] is a synonym for [0-9] (using ASCII digits). [:digit:] on itself without the surrounding brackets is not a valid expression, in no context. I took this issue because a single [[:digit:]] does not match one digit, as it should, same with [[:alnum:]] and other character classes. Only if used as [[:digit:]]? or [[:digit:]]* a digit is matched. The use of constructs like [:digit:]? or ([:digit:]) is undefined. In fact a better implementation would not match anything there. For the definition of POSIX regexps see also http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/xbd_chap09.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
