To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68524
User tl changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
CC|'' |'cl'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 14 02:03:54 -0700
2006 -------
The original working code in SvxUnoTextBase::insertTextContent m172 looked like
this:
aSelection.nEndPos += 1;
aSelection.nStartPos = aSelection.nEndPos;
pRange->SetSelection( aSelection );
Because aSelection is local object shadowing the the object aSelection class
member for warning-free code it was changed to this:
maSelection.nEndPos += 1;
maSelection.nStartPos = aSelection.nEndPos;
pRange->SetSelection( aSelection );
I changed it to
aSelection.nEndPos += 1;
aSelection.nStartPos = aSelection.nEndPos;
//maSelection = aSelection; //???
pRange->SetSelection( aSelection );
which is basically what was done before.
But since I think the class object should also internally keep track of the
selection I would think the line
//maSelection = aSelection; //???
should be uncommented in order to have the internal and returned selection
match.
BTW: This would have been also a problem in the original code. But it seems no
one ever ran into this...
Need to ask CL about this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
