To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68929
User sb changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
CC|'joergwartenberg' |'joergwartenberg,sb'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 28 00:34:11 -0700
2006 -------
The proposed patch makes the code unnecessarily complex, by lumping together
definition and use of the various strings as PROPNAME_ macros using
PROPNAME_IMPL_DECL macro to differentiate the two cases. Why not have as
interface an enum of propname values together with an (inline) accessor function
rtl::OUString getPropname(enum Propname), getting rid of all the macro stuff.
Also, initialization should not use broken double checked locking pattern, but
instead the rtl/instance.hxx stuff (and no fprintf logging).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]