To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41586
User st changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
CC|'st,thing' |'mh,st,thing'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target milestone|OOo Later |not determined
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 4 04:37:33 -0700
2006 -------
Eric, there is no reason to differentiate between patches implementing
features/enhancements or defects in this early stage.
So the answer to your question is:
The initial handling should make sure that an issue of type PATCH is assigned to
a project member that will drive the review. This procedure is the same for all
issues of type PATCH. This means that neither the owner "requirements" nor a
target "OOo Later" is appropriate.
Martin will in parallel follow-up on this topic with people involved in task
handling and rfe evaluation. Thanks, Stefan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
