To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70783
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 26 13:44:59 -0700 2006 ------- ihi, tamunia_ch, agree. here are only some (issue related) points. 1. There was no ka NL community at all and when i had almost half (11,000) of UI strings translated, strictly followed instructions, submit the issue http://www.archivum.info/[email protected]/2005-02/msg00159.html and 2. Other guy(s) "explained" me that there is no way, but to work under sombody's coordination - and very late i understand that was/is wrong. and 3. when i understand this we submit translation in the beginning of August http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68065 QUESTION: why now our community (which thougt exclusively for quality and not for own benefit and never tried to got financial support for this like others) must be ignored AND why it could be [possibly] harmful for final Georgian OOo 2.1 product? Once again - 1 year old article regarding FOSS http://www.gia.ge/index.php?ind=reviews&op=entry_view&iden=1 Thanks Ain :) Just tried to find why our work is ignored and disregarded. How such decision can done in such hurry. As for double leading - i'm really not going to be (and will NEVER be) lead of OOo NL community (others can try). :) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
