To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70859
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 3 13:57:37 -0800 2006 ------- > PackageVersion is the version of the (unix) packages. Therefore we introduced > a three-digit version number "a.b.c". For OpenOffice.org this is currently > "2.1.0" Yes. And having a packageversion that doesn't match the version of OOo that's included in the package doesn't make sense at all. > openoffice.org-core01-<packageversion>-<minor>.i586.rpm Not minor, but release... > This number is only used for packaging reasons. It is not used in the Office > products (except the OOo about box ;-) ). So why introduce another variable that duplicates this and has even less usage? Your comment unfortunately doesn't answer my question. * Why do you need another variable if the PACKAGEVERSION already shows the requested information? * Why don't you use different values for PACKAGEVERSION in OOo and SO? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
