To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66635
User sb changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
CC|'' |'sb'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 10 01:01:17 -0800
2006 -------
Generally, I think com.sun.star.reflection is already in a rather messy state.
The XIdlClass and XTypeDescription concepts present similar information in two
independent ways. Ideally, this would have been combined.
@ramon_garcia: From what you write I understand that XIdlReflection.forName is
a workaround for the functionality you miss (mapping from UNO TYPE to
XIdlClass), but you fear that the workaround has negative performance
implications. Did you measure that or is it just a gut feeling? I would not
want to complicate the messy com.sun.star.reflection further with methods for
which there are already obvious and unproblematic workarounds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
