To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70975
User andreschnabel changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 10 09:43:44 -0800
2006 -------
closed as I get the notification in 2.0.3 online update search.
Frank:
It was indeed not my intention, to use QAtrack as the portal for endusers. This
could only be a source for "internal" information.
So .. what was interesting to know, is who needs to be informed in what
situations and what data need to be provided.
atm QAtrack does only notify about new builds for testing. Stefan Taxhet did
request a functionalyt, that informs about approved builds (and makes the
distribution to the mirrornetwork easier).
At the moment I have no idea, who needs to be informed about the approval and
availability of stebale builds :-( (I only know, that Stefan moves them to the
mirrors and Joost enters the information to the bouncer - what ever this is).
but we should rather discuss this at [EMAIL PROTECTED], to get all the people
involved who
might be interested in the process of approving a buld and having it announced
at all places.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
