To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=71449
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 14 01:36:34 -0800 2006 ------- Hi there, > I plan a build-time dictionary pre-compression for OpenOffice.org. > For example, using alias compression of the integrated Hunspell, > nearly 3/4 MB RAM saved for en_US (~5.5 MB -> 4.8), 3 MB for > hu_HU (17->14), and 9 MB for Arabic (18->9). So - the main memory win for us came, not from shrinking the size of the dictionary on disk, but from not duplicating all those strings into malloc'd memory [ which has a substantial malloc overhead per string ]. Also - of course for thin-clients, the mmapped memory is shared, where heap allocated memory cannot be, so we win yet more. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
