To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43103
User jl changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Status|STARTED |RESOLVED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution| |INVALID
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 28 01:18:42 -0800
2005 -------
Thinking about it, i came to the conclusion that we must not mix a 32 bit build
with a 64 bit Java. The reason is that we use JNI which uses the native
pointers. Therefor we needed a true 64 bit OOo which also uses the jni.h from 64
bit Java. Otherwise, we may cause crashes which are really hard to reproduce.
JL->mdaniel: I recommend to use a 32 bit Java along with a 32 bit OOo. But I
can't say for sure if this works reliably on a 64 bit platform, since this is
not officially supported yet. However, there is a 64 bit port underway as I
indicated recently.
Thanks anyway for supporting us.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]