To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61856
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 20 08:55:54 -0800 2006 ------- Thanks for testing. I wouldn't be worried about the: dmake: Warning: -- Internal Warning: finished pid 1548 is not in pq!? warning. This has been like this forever but it was silently ignored before. It points to a potential problem that we wait for all children but we should probably only wait for childs of the current process group. (Something for later) This dmake: Error: -- Internal Error: Child is missing but still listed in _procs[x] 10: No child processes Temporary or .ERRREMOVE targets might not have been removed! we should slightly worry about but I guess it's a cygwin problem when native childs get killed (Especially from a cygwin.bat shell). The processes shouldn't vanish without a wait. *UNLESS* this was a recursive dmake and the first mentioned warning occured and we were treating a "rogue" process. How about I clean the patch from all the verbosity and commit it. If it also passes a few tinderbox builds from several different OSs we can finally close this CWS. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
