To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43674
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 28 05:17:03 -0800 2005 ------- Hmmm... this may turn out to be a different issue of "Tables for selection aren't sorted alphabetically by schema name". After creating further tables in the database, the missing TESTUSER.PRODUCTS table turned up... but not in the right order. The "TESTUSER" schema was listed after the CTX schema, waayyyy before the correct position of after the SYS schema (of alphabetical ordering). With Oracle 10g, if a user has any reasonable amount of priviledges in the system, they're probably going to be able to see ~800 odd tables, and scrolling from the first to the last one looking for one entry in an unordered list won't work acceptably. Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
