To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73033
                 Issue #|73033
                 Summary|2.1 formats differently from 2.0
               Component|Word processor
                 Version|OOo 2.1
                Platform|Macintosh
                     URL|
              OS/Version|All
                  Status|UNCONFIRMED
       Status whiteboard|
                Keywords|
              Resolution|
              Issue type|DEFECT
                Priority|P3
            Subcomponent|formatting
             Assigned to|mru
             Reported by|ecdowney





------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan  1 05:31:18 -0800 
2007 -------
We are finding that .odt files created with 2.0 are being displayed and
formatted differently in 2.1. This includes several areas including wrapping
around embedded OLE components and images, and changes in font styles and sizes.
In effect, we can not use 2.1 with any of our hundreds of documents created with
2.0 without extensive manual labor. If this ever happens again, we will abandon
using OO because we can not afford this huge level of effort for no productive
reason. I can not find a way to submit examples with this bug report, so please
feel free to contact me directly for example documents, example results etc.
Thank you.

Elwood Downey, President, Clear Sky Institute, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to