To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53359





------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 25 05:20:40 -0800 
2007 -------
Yep, that is a possible solution. 
Does this mean that if we have any errors we get the sum of all errors and
warning (errors AFAIK always cause wrnings to pop up as well)?

It would be nicer if we could distinguish the type of error we had in the test -
that is: Error outside of testcase, Error inside a test, warnings and 
qaerrorlogs.

I guess it is not really important to know exactly how many errors occurred, it
is sufficient to know that there were any at all to find out that the test needs
attention.

So either we could do a OIWQ 4-bit bitfield (Outside errors, inside, warn,
QAErrorLog) or a 16 bit thing with 4 bit for every errorcondition making it
possible to get values up to 15.
Example:

00000001 010101000 = 0 Err. Outside, 1 Err. Inside, 5 warnings and 8 QA 
Errorlogs.

What do you think?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to