To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3395
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 30 21:18:01 -0800 2007 ------- I agree wholeheartedly. If OOo is simply a replacement for MS Office, then fine you're just about there - you've got most of MS functionality and then some. But if you realy want to be top of the Office packages, then you'll have to look at others as well - MS never was the best and they're still a long way behind most (especially WP). Even since the DOS days (when Borland was still making WP 1980's) the reveal codes feature was there, as was styles, table generation, macros, autocorrect, gramatik check, phrase & paragraph libraries, built-in metafile / graphics editor, etc. etc. MS at present still falls short on some of these concepts which is more than 20 years old - e.g. its Graphics editor is a joke (fortunately OOo has a true graphics editor in addition to the MS like "objects"). --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
