To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65039
User mh changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
CC|'andreschnabel,axelb,clyti|'andreschnabel,axelb,clyti
|e,danohnesorg,dnaber,dprin|e,danohnesorg,dnaber,dprin
|a,erdalronahi,gaute,lauren|a,erdalronahi,gaute,lauren
|tgodard,pescetti,thing' |tgodard,pescetti,sb,thing'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 28 10:35:18 +0000
2007 -------
mere aggregation seems to be possible as long as they are separated packages,
e.g. have ooo-core-package1 (with LGPL code) and ooo-dict-package2 (with GPL
dictionary data) and ooo-core-package1 is not dependent to ooo-dict-package2.
This seem to be the easy case.
remaining problems may be:
1. is it sufficient to include in the THIRDPARTYLICENSEREADME.html: "This
software may include/aggregate the <bla>-dictionary under GPL license ..." ?
2. On Windows (and maybe other installers the Linux rpm and Solaris pkg) all the
packages have been combined to one big install blob. Is this still aggregation ?
As long as we ensure that we can easily detach the GPL'd dictionaries with a
simple mechanism from the overall install blob all concerns should be adressed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
