To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76106
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 5 06:49:16 +0000 2007 ------- I know I'm immodest :), but why only the L versions? Those require sString.indexOfAsciiL( "foo", sizeof( "foo" ) - 1 ) or sString.indexOfAsciiL( RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM( "foo" ) ) or sString.indexOfAsciiL( pSomeAsciiString, strlen( pSomeAsciiString ) ) where the non-L version would allow the shorter sString.indexOfAscii( "foo" ) resp. sString.indexOfAscii( pSomeAsciiString ) Any chance you re-consider this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
