To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76054
User sba changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Assigned to|sba |requirements
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 11 16:01:46 +0000
2007 -------
SBA: Thanks for the bugdoc. It eases understanding this issue more than
yet-another-thousand-words could have. And the summary now reflects the problem.
Good.
I agree that "technically correct" vs. "intuitive for all" still waits for a
"perfect" solution here.
Again: Too much words hinder processing issues! At least it steals time from all
those who have to read it THROUGH to get the point. And it raises the odds that
a "cross-reader" will miss the most important sentence of the entire description
and thus coming to a "non-satisfying conclusion".
Reassigned to requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
