To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76153





------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 19 19:25:07 +0000 
2007 -------
Hi moyogo,

> I'll send the JCA form asap.

Good. Btw, what is your full name, so I can look it up in the list of
approved assignments?

> 1. The ThousandSeparator is ' ' non-breaking space. Thanks for noticing the
> empty one.

The format codes have to be adapted to use it. I'll do that.

> 2. The ListSeparator is  ' ; '.

The separator should be one character only, I'll remove the surrounding
blanks.

> 3. I set the negative currency form to
>    <FormatCode>[CURRENCY] # ##0,00;[RED]-[CURRENCY] # ##0,00</FormatCode>

Also the codes not having [RED] negatives probably should be adapted,
I'll do.

> 4. The CurrencySymbol is now "F", althought "Fc" is often encountered.

Which means that also the LC_FORMAT replaceTo attribute should use 'F',
will do. Btw, I assigned the MS-LangID 0x0639 to ln-CD, so it reads now
replaceTo="[$F-639]".

> 5. The IndexKey is now A-E Ɛ F-O Ɔ P-Z

Fine.


> Regarding the collation :
> 
> the alphabetical order is the most common one I have encountered. 
> The morphological order (ln_morph) is recommended by some linguists so it 
> should
> be available.
> But I think the alphabetical order (ln_charset) should be the default, 
> unless there’s an official order that is set by decree or such, which hasn’t
> happened.

Since we don't have a "Morphological" collation algorithm yet, not even
in the user interface, would that be a proper name? The alphabetical
order usually is called "Alphanumeric". Note that most languages don't
use a "Character Set" order, but have alphanumeric instead.

The morphological order also resembles somewhat that of the hu_HU locale
where a "charset" collation is used. As I'm absolutely not familiar with
Lingala, could the alphabetical order be called "Alphanumeric" (and the
collation data file be named ln_alphanumeric.txt) and the morpholigical
order be called "Character Set" (and the file be named ln_charset.txt)
instead? That way we wouldn't need an additional algorithm name and UI
entry.

The IndexKey element then should follow whatever we decide here and we
may as well need two elements.

I noticed the percent format codes have a blank between digits and the
% character. This is usually not the case and the percent character
immediately follows the number, like in 0% . Intended?

Btw, the Locale element had the attribute allowUpdateFromCLDR="yes",
which should only be set if normative locale data is available in the
CLDR and the locale data may be updated semi-automatically. As we didn't
do a comparison yet I defined that to "no".

  Eike


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to