To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75359
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 12 18:22:19 +0000 2007 ------- AW: If it's only about NbcInsertObject, i checked it. I see no reason for 'using SdrPage::NbcInsertObject' in FmFormPage class definition since there is only one function prototype (usage is not ambigious) and only one flat derivation from SdrPage If it's about the SUPD (AFAIK the build ID) definition in svdpage.hxx, that's old stuff and far above 356 nowadays. It could be probably removed, so below 356 there would not be any amiguity. Someone from ReleaseEngineering has to decide that no version below 356 needs to be built anymore (e.g. bug fixing in StarOffice 5.2 or something like that?). For NbcRemoveObject, NbcReplaceObject and ReplaceObject there is no reason for the using definition in FmFormPage class definition. HTH. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
