To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77298
User fs changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
CC|'' |'fs,jsc'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assigned to|fs |np
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 16 07:56:08 +0000
2007 -------
fs->np:
Indeed,
http://api.openoffice.org/docs/common/ref/com/sun/star/sdbcx/XTablesSupplier-xref.html
claims that the css.sdb.Connection would support this interface, but
http://api.openoffice.org/docs/common/ref/com/sun/star/sdb/Connection.html does
not list it.
However, css.sdb.Connection includes the service
css.sdbcx.DatabaseAccessConnection, which in fact *does* include
XTablesSupplier.
I'm not sure (and don't have an opinion about) whether it's correct behaviour
for autodoc to add the Connection to the "services supporting this interface"
section ... Please decide (together with JSC?).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
