To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77281
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 12:50:53 +0000 2007 ------- Given below is some testing perform by our engineers : We tried adding 170 1MB (all 'a's in it) files for cvs and svn Without -z9 compression : CVS ------- real 1m38.753s user 0m0.895s sys 0m1.585s SVN ------- real 2m19.443s user 0m16.768s sys 0m3.868s Later we perform testing taking into consideration the 'client compression' factor as CVS by default has no compression unless invoked with -z9. However SVN by default has zlib compression With -z9 compression factor : CVS --------------- real 2m39.754s user 0m7.572s sys 0m0.620s SVN --------------- real 1m5.367s user 0m15.329s sys 0m3.613s This inconsistent result though the second one in favor of svn suggests that '-z9' could be making a difference. I assume these test were performed with the cvs -z9 compression factor. Please note in theory subversion is faster for commits. In practice it may be slow for some datasets/usage patterns. We need a solid repeatable case so that we can at-least justify the behavior if not change it. -Jobin. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
