To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77442
User ab changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Ever confirmed| |1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |STARTED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target milestone|--- |OOo 2.x
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 23 08:34:14 +0000
2007 -------
ab->cyhawk: I have some questions concerning the introspection.cxx related
patch.
First, I agree with sb who commented in #i73468:
"For one, most of those places are probably better fixed by simply dropping the
L suffix. For another, please do not introduce any new C style casts in C++
code."
Any objections against just dropping the L suffix?
Second: What's the sense of changing e.g.
sal_Int32 iAllExportedMethod = 0L; to
sal_Int32 iAllExportedMethod(0L);
I don't like this syntax for simple types and I don't see any effect concerning
type
warning problems you might want to adress. So why not just also changing it to
sal_Int32 iAllExportedMethod = 0;
as sb proposed?
STARTED, OOo 2.x
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
