To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77649
User ama changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Status|NEW |STARTED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 1 15:24:50 +0000
2007 -------
Yes, your last patch will work for every scenario I'm able to imagine :-)
Now we can have a look if it can be optimized. Your new code iterates the cell
content, the SwNodes::GoNexct(..) function call iterates the cell content, too.
Your iteration is necessary but the old GoNext(..) call can be removed if your
iteration delivers the correct text node.
Something like this:
SwTxtNode *pTextNode = 0;
for(..pNext..)
{
if( IsTableNode() )
{
pTextNode = 0;
break; // Table found
}
if( IsTxtNode() )
{
if( pTextNode )
{
pTextNode = 0;
break;
}
pTextNode = pNext;
}
}
if( pTextNode )
{
.....
}
else
return ULONG_MAX;
What do you think?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
