To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77441
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 11 09:07:46 +0000 2007 ------- fs->cyhawk: I'm not sure about the motivation of the patch in extensions/source/propctrlr/propertyhandler.hxx. I guess it's about m_aMutex (not) being the very first member, which might be desirable in case it's used as reference to the ctor of other members. Is this true? If so, I'd prefer deriving PropertyHandler from ::cppu::BaseMutex, which would reach the same goal in a more robust way. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
