To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79249
User rene changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Status|CLOSED |RESOLVED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 5 08:36:17 +0000
2007 -------
of: uh, sorry, indeed. forget to change it in the dropdown box.
for more details, IRC log:
10:07 <@lgodard> _rene_: any idea/advice about issue 79249
10:08 <@IZBot> Installation DEFECT NEW P3 OOo 2.2.0 and 2.2.1 .deb packages
cause problems with aptitude
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79249
10:08 <@lgodard> where is pavel ? Hollydays ?
10:08 <@_rene_> apparently
10:09 <@_rene_> lgodard: non-bug. user error.
10:09 -!- geki_ (death within) [EMAIL PROTECTED] has joined
#dev.openoffice.org
10:09 <@lgodard> _rene_: what do you mean ?
10:09 <@_rene_> this is a user error. this is *not* a bug
10:09 <@lgodard> _rene_: what kind of error ?
10:09 <@_rene_> neither in the debs nor in aptitude
10:10 <@lgodard> _rene_: what should we do to avoid this ?
10:10 <@_rene_> lgodard: when you install something using dpkg -i, aptitude
might think they were automatically installed due to deps
10:10 <@_rene_> lgodard: and when it thinks that, if nothing depends on it
anymore aptitude will remove it. that's a feature
10:10 <@_rene_> lgodard: your user can't be *that* experienced, otherwise he'd
know that...
10:11 <@_rene_> lgodard: (no offense intended)
10:11 <@_rene_> lgodard: but that happens, it's just a bad coincidence between
dpkg -i and aptitude and (maybe) apt-get 0.7.x in the future
10:11 <@_rene_> lgodard: you, as OOo, can't do *anything* wrt it
10:12 <@lgodard> _rene_: is there a way to avoid this ?
10:12 <@lgodard> _rene_: an alternate installation process ?
10:12 <@_rene_> well, you *could* disable that feature in aptitude. otherwise,
no
10:13 <@lgodard> _rene_: you meen freeze ooo .deb versions, mark them as not
being handle ?
10:13 <@lgodard> _rene_: /me just tries to understand and find a suitable
solution
10:13 <@_rene_> no. you can't do anything for this in the packages.
10:14 <@IZBot> New news from mws: SRC680_m219 ready for use.
10:14 <@_rene_> aptitude has a feature to remove not used packages anymore when
they got automatically installed
10:14 <@_rene_> like: if you install kde, the kdelibs get installed, right?
10:14 <@_rene_> so, "normally" with apt-get, if you remove kde again, kdelibs
would still be there because you just told apt-get you want to
remove whatever but didn't say kdelibs
10:15 <@_rene_> aptitude (and apt 0.7.x now) have the feature that it tracks
what got automatically installed
10:15 <@_rene_> and in that case, when removing kde, it also would remove
kdelibs when it's not needed anymore
10:15 <@_rene_> and in this case, it thinks that the OOo packages are not
needed anymore. for whatever reason.
10:17 -!- _Nesshof_ (Ratte) [EMAIL PROTECTED] has joined
#dev.openoffice.org
10:23 <@lgodard> _rene_: thx a lot for your response
10:23 <@_rene_> feel free to paste this to the issue. or should I?
10:23 <@lgodard> _rene_: yes please do it
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
