To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80054
User fs changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 27 18:52:04 +0000
2007 -------
Looks good in CWS.
fs->np: Also stumbled upon multiple occurances of the @see flavor like in
http://api.openoffice.org/docs/common/ref/com/sun/star/animations/XAnimationNode.html#RestartDefault.
I suppose this is something we should fix in the IDLs, shouldn't we?
However, autodoc should add such things to Autodoc_DiagnosticMessages.txt. I
mean, it produces an "? (no identifier found)", this certainly justifies a
warning, doesn't it? Warnings in such cases are our only chance to finally get
rid of all those documentation errors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
