To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79843
User sb changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Assigned to|sb |kendy
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|STARTED |NEW
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 7 15:11:50 +0000
2007 -------
@kendy: Yes, INET_PROT_GENERIC_HIERARCHICAL should solve the problem rather
nicely. (INET_PROT_GENERIC is used nowhere outside INetURLObject itself, at
least in SRC680m225, so your patch should be safe.) However, I have two minor
issues with the patch:
1 Please do not reorder INET_PROT_SMB (to avoid problems with compatible builds
etc.).
2 Please replace the two occurrences of "m_eScheme == INET_PROT_GENERIC" (resp.
"!=") with "m_eScheme == INET_PROT_GENERIC || m_eScheme ==
INET_PROT_GENERIC_HIERARCHICAL" instead of the rather indirect
"getSchemeInfo().m_pScheme[0] != '\0'" (to keep the code more direct).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
