To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80144
User hjs changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|FIXED |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 30 10:59:44 +0000
2007 -------
ouch... without reading any documentation, i would expect the following order
from this example:
try to make %.a from %.b or %.b1, whatever exists (ambiguity if both exist). if
that doesn't fit, use rule w.o. prerequisite to create some kind of default.
%.a : %.b
@echo b
touch $@
%.a : %.b1
@echo b1
touch $@
%.a :
@echo none
touch $@
if the shortest interference chain is preferred, this won't happen that way...
also regarding #i80368# one (me :)) could argue that the longer (more specific)
rule should be preferred.
as said, all without looking up the docs yet. just as a quick hint that there
might be some more pitfalls lurking...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
