To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81309
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 8 13:45:29 +0000 2007 ------- The problem is when people use code without asking its owner (if someone used so3 without asking me or mav that would be the case) or when people make big changes like the ResMgr change without really having a strategy to find all the pitfalls and without a comprehensive testing. There is no difference between so3 and binfilter. Both are modules only used to load and save old binary files. As you write you don't care about the size of binfilter I don't know why you care for the size of so3. I agree that it is questionable if investing time in binfilter is worth the effort. But it's perhaps even more worth it than doing something in so3 as the amount of superfluous code is bigger in binfilter than in so3. I don't know why base crashes due to problems in so3. I wonder why base uses so3 at all. Perhaps we should follow up on this elsewhere. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
