To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81445
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 11 14:45:27 +0000 2007 ------- sb: > - Java OOo extension code is guaranteed to have a small, well-defined set of > Java classes available at runtime. (ScriptFramework.jar is obviously missing, Understood. > which is the---sole---subject of this issue.) Well, the ml discussion went also to the generic problem and jsc suggested you had a problem which can also "fix" the problem for !ScriptFramework.jar. I fou don't, ok... ;-( > - There is currently no way for Java OOo extensions to access other Java > classes that are part of the OOo installation. If you have a problem with > this, please file an issue. > > - If a Java OOo extension needs access to additional Java classes that are > expected to be available on the system, it should work to add those Java > classes to the Java class path. If that does not work in a specific scenario, > please file an issue for that specific scenario. The problem is that this doesn't really scale. >- If a Java OOo extension needs access to other additional Java classes, it > should work to include those Java classes in the extension. If there are > problems in a specific scenario, please file an issue for that specific > scenario. OK, will do... (referring to all three) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
