To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80946
User sb changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Status|STARTED |RESOLVED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution| |INVALID
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 5 11:00:36 +0000
2007 -------
As I posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on October 4, 2007 (but which seems to not
have shown up yet):
"Not thought through enough, unfortunately: The general UNO way to compute
function indices (see <http://udk.openoffice.org/common/man/typesystem.html>)
sorts all direct attributes before all direct methods of an interface, and at
least the binary-UNO--C++-UNO bridge and the URP protocol rely on this function
index definition.
"Further removing the right to add attributes at the end of extensible
interfaces would limit the usefulness of such an "extensible" concept even more,
to the point where it becomes ridiculous. So, it seems the splendid days when
we will have our cake and actually eat it too are once again not in sight.
'Fuck it.' :( "
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
