To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=83024


User mba changed the following:

                What    |Old value                 |New value
================================================================================
                  Status|NEW                       |RESOLVED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Resolution|                          |WORKSFORME
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 30 17:37:02 +0000 
2007 -------
> But Writer OLE use Web Layout only, if you embed the OLE directly, but they 
> use Page Layout if you embed it from file.
> That is confusing. Is the difference in the behavior intended?

As I wrote, "Insert from file" seems to be broken. The size of the object should
be recalculated from the "pure object" (means: a web layout) before the object
is inserted. This would be conforming with the current design.

> The page margin is transparent, but it is there. In addition the embedded 
> document can be smaller than the "peephole". The remaining place is filled 
> with the object background.

That *is* the problem. The text (including indents of course) never should be
smaller than the "peephole". This is what goes wrong when you use "Insert From
File".

> My OLE object has pages and e.g. page numbers work as they should and you set
> the view in a way, that you see the bottom part of one page and the top part 
> of the following page.

Sure, but it doesn't make sense! At least not for inplace editing.

As I now know the reason and can set it as I like, the issue can be closed.
Workforme, invalid, wontfix?

Well, there is definitely *something* that needs to be fixed. I would like to
treat the size of OLE objects very differently but that would be a long story to
tell. And doing it here might confuse the issue. I'm also afraid that the
priority for improving this wouldn't be very high.

So it's "WFM" (works as designed), I think.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to