To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=83489
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 9 16:42:42 +0000
2007 -------
Hmm. I am sorry, it's actually a 4.2.2 (I hate Debians gcc versioning...); more
specifically:
gcc version 4.2.3 20071014 (prerelease) (Debian 4.2.2-3)
With the same files as yours:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# gcc -Wextra -c bad.c
bad.c: In function 'f':
bad.c:3: warning: empty body in an else-statement
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# gcc -Wextra -c good.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/#
But I know that when I patched the header in question to have a {} around the
macro which'll do nothing, files including it still complained.
Maybe it has to do with the differences of your testcase with the reality?
(C vs. C++, gcc vs. g++, class function vs. written in the code directly, in .c
vs. in included .hxx)?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
