To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75634
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 4 04:17:09 +0000 2007 ------- Hi Karl, I looked current ja_charset.txt and data in w3.kcua.ac.jp. Please do not replace current ja_charset.txt with data in w3.kcua.ac.jp. I believe current ja_charset.txt has more reasonable order at least for Kana part. I do not know where ja_charset.txt came from, but if we can get updated version (with JIS X 0213:2004) from the same source, then we should update with it. I mean, if we can't, then I feel we should leave it as is for now. I do not see benefit to break backward compatibility, and actually I failed to find added surrogate paired characters collation data which OOo can utilize on the net. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
