To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=83878
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 4 10:24:50 +0000 2007 ------- 1 doesn't make sense. When you use the fature you know what you are doing or are a packager. On Windows you probably will not need it at all. Why bother then? The fs argument doesn't make sense either, /, /usr, /var etc. can't be on fat, nether can /home, too many things want permissions and (sym/hard)links. You can use fat for you data (maybe in a subdir under home), but not for the main system, so I think this argument is moot. for 2 I agree with cmc too. When packagers or system admins are the only users of this (why should normal users not use the "normal" extensions) we don't need a UI. The packages would use unopkg directly anyway, and so you can tell the admins to do so, too --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
