To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81534
User kendy changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
CC|'' |'kendy,sb'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 13 13:21:36 +0000
2007 -------
Looking at the macro definition in inc/osl/doublecheckedlocking.h: After a
comment why it is needed on some platforms, it boils down to
#define OSL_DOUBLE_CHECKED_LOCKING_MEMORY_BARRIER() /* empty */
everywhere. Is that a remnant of something? Is that a beginning of
something? ;-) If the former, I'd vote for removing it from the code for good,
if the latter, it seems to me that the code is always used as
OSL_DOUBLE_CHECKED_LOCKING_MEMORY_BARRIER();
so we should probably define it as
#define OSL_DOUBLE_CHECKED_LOCKING_MEMORY_BARRIER() {} /* empty */
or something, shouldn't we? That way we would avoid the warning everywhere...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
