To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84728
User mba changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Issue type|DEFECT |FEATURE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P2 |P3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 19 09:16:09 +0000
2007 -------
This was a feature even in OOo 2.0!
The spec clearly requested that no extension shall be shown. So strictly
speaking it was a bug all the time that we showed it. At least sometimes. ;-)
Of course that doesn't mean that just because it's written in the spec we must
follow it. But I don't want to change that on an ad-hoc basis. This clearly
needs some discussion. I assume that the people that have created the spec had
some valid reasons for their decision not to show extensions.
So for the moment I change the type to "FEATURE" for that reason. I also think
that P2 is an exaggeration just because it causes problems for a single
customer. Overall I don't think that this is a critical issue.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
