To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=31612
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 23 18:19:40 +0000 2008 ------- If OpenOffice is going to compete, the features have to be as good or better than MS's product. I don't see any issue with 1024 columns today but it could be an issue tomorrow which would limit me. To me, if the number of columns can be dynamic, only created as necessary, the performance won't be that big of a hit. Also if it is dynamic, (Only the number needed), there could be a performance improvement. If you only need 10 columns, then only 10 are saved. Maybe a default 2^6 columns with the ability to create upto 2^15 columns if required. This is one bit better than MS. :) I prefer the dynamic way of creating columns (and rows) over a static need. If there is going to be modifications for the number of columns, then why impose another small limit. I hate to say it but MS has set the bar and OOo has to at least make that level to remain competitive. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
