To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85398
User jcb62281 changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
CC|'kendy,kz,rene' |'jcb62281,kendy,kz,rene'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 5 18:34:30 +0000
2008 -------
I think the given patch is suboptimal--it disables the visibilty feature
completely when the problem is certain to exist only with
-fvisibility-inlines-hidden; is there no way to use -fvisibility=hidden but not
-fvisibility-inlines-hidden?
I've made longer comments explaining what I think the cause of this is on Issue
84965. In a nutshell: -fvisibility-inlines-hidden causes GCC to emit
relocations that shared objects on amd64 are not allowed to use. This appears
to be an unavoidable consequence of what -fvisibility-inlines-hidden is intended
to do, and the only bug in GCC here is that it doesn't detect that
-fvisibility-inlines-hidden and -fPIC conflict on amd64 and give a more useful
error. (In other words, trying to hide all evidence of inlines prevents truly
making position-independent code, which x86-64 shared objects are required to
be.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
