To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45689
User ama changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Target milestone|OOo 2.0 |OOo 2.0.1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 22 00:46:58 -0800
2005 -------
Mmh, of course the parser of OOo2.0 should parse correctly formulas from OOo1.0.
But the question is: What is correct??
We did some changes in the parser some time ago and an side effect was that we
do not split terms like "1over" automatically like before. The question is, is
the behaviour of OOo1.0 correct or OOo2.0?
The risk to change the parser just now is too high, so I retarget this issue to
OOo2.0.1.
But we have to think about the "correct" behaviour if we really want to fix this
for OOo2.0.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
