To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45163
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 22 07:33:46 -0800 2005 ------- I found out, what decides which version of the OpenSymbol font is accepted or rejected on the Win32 platform: The "good" versions either had the "symbol flag" or they had a version 0 of the OS/2 table in the font. Other versions of the OS/2 table require more info about the code pages supported by the font. Since OpenSymbol doesn't support any of the traditional code pages it just indicates support for the symbol code page. The Win32 platforms doesn't expect a font which only supports a symbol code page to be unicode encoded... The workaround for this is to not claim any knowledge about supported codepages when the font just supports unicode encoded symbols. This can be accomplished by using a version 0 OS/2 table for the exported font. Version 1.8 of the OpenSymbol font IH provided as attachment above works, because this font just claims to support Latin-1 and Win32 happily accepts that. On the other hand support for Latin-1 is non-existant in OpenSymbol, so there may be some side-effects, e.g. not accessable symbols on a chinese Win98... --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
