To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=22519
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 18 07:29:46 +0000 2008 ------- I do not understand why resolution is set to "resolved". Please refer to http://qa.openoffice.org/scdocs/issue_lifecycle.html. The "RESOLVED" status is to be used when the target system (here, issuezilla) is modified, and awaiting verification. In other words, this resolution means that all possible actions are already taken; and nothing needs to be done further if everything goes well. But is that so? All that Jeeva offers is to "consider it" **IF** OOo migrates from IssueZilla to Project Tracker. That's two remote possibilities rolled into one! OK let us pretend that those two actions WILL happen in future. Even then, does this issue deserve a "Resolved" status TODAY? I think Jeeva just handed a death sentence to it. Sadly, Sun/OOo staff sweeps maximum possible issues under carpet like this; and I don't see a voice of sanity who calls out a halt to this madness. The correct process is to keep the issue OPEN and forward it to the policymaker who decides whether to migrate to Project Tracker. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
