To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89811
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 23 14:35:57 +0000 2008 ------- AW->kohei: I did not question that the replacement itself is safe (please read again), i mentioned that it is not safe when someone changes the macro (what will probably not happen, but is possible). I just gave my comments (two arguments) why i think doing it in one CWS would be better, but also said Your method will work (which includes the offer to do it in svx). One argument for CWSes per se is that something like this can be done isolated and be added in one single transaction. I also opt against saying it's overkill. That one CWS would not even get incompatible... I hate to say it - and You might take me as a nitpicker for this 8-;, but re-using another CWS for this is also not the theory behind CWSes. Don't take me wrong: This is theoretically about CWSes, for practical reasons i agree doing this in less dagerous cases like here. Just my 2 cents... --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
