To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90810
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 24 14:02:43 +0000 2008 ------- Pavel, could you be a bit more specific? Does the test for the old .Net2003 compiler fail? I can't no longer verify it here with reasonable effort. I would also like to propose the degradation of the .Net2003 compiler on DEV300 to a still supported but deprecated compiler, meaning that issues arising from it are no longer P1. We won't be able to support it forever, though. Please see here: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/supported_compilers_for_openoffice_org Reassigning the issue back to pjanik: Pavel, seemingly you are the only one still using .Net2003 (what about Volker and Thor?), could you please provide a workable patch which special cases the broken case and not the correct case? I'm open for all solutions including "using namespace std::" but if there is a less dirty solution I would definitely prefer it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
